Disclaimer: This content is archival. For maximum readability, view PDF.
Expected Council Ac1970 and 1973. A particularly sensitive issue was the leadership role of UN envoy Abdel-Elah Al-Khatib versus that of the AU High Level Ad Hoc Committee. (The 5 May meeting of the Contact Group on Libya had previously agreed that Khatib should be the focal point for all mediation efforts and the AU side expressed serious concerns that this approach could side-line the AU's role.)
The discussion of Côte d'Ivoire took place on the day of the inauguration of President Alassane Ouattara in Yamoussoukro, and it appears that this part of the meeting reflected participants' relief that the protracted crisis had ended and expressed hope for the country's future.
On Sudan, members spoke about the aftermath of the referendum, the upcoming independence of the South and of their concerns about increased violence in Darfur and Abyei. On that last issue, members of both councils stressed the importance of the July 2009 ruling by The Hague's Permanent Court of Arbitration. An area of some tension appears to have been the approach to the Darfur Peace Process (DPP), which the PSC has fully embraced, but the Security Council has not with some members distinctly reluctant to do so. (The creation of a better enabling environment for the DPP is seen by those members as essential, including: civil and political rights of participants such that they can exercise their views without fear of retribution; freedom of speech and assembly to allow for open consultations; freedom of movement for participants and UNAMID; proportional participation among Darfurians; freedom from harassment, arbitrary arrest and intimidation; and freedom from interference by the government or armed movements.) These formulations were included in the final communiqué despite initial resistance from some of the PSC members to this language.
On Somalia, the key issue was the financing for the AU Mission in Somalia (AMISOM) which the African side would like to be fully covered through UN assessed contributions and which several members of the Security Council oppose on the grounds that the UN should not be fully funding an operation unless it has command over it. Members of the PSC argued for the need of predictable, reliable and timely resources for AMISOM, including reimbursement for contingent-owned equipment. Members of the Security Council, while noting the recommendations in this respect of the PSC of 15 October 2010, stopped short of willing to include any new commitments in the communiqué.
The communiqué issued at the end of the meeting was considerably longer than the final documents from the previous consultations and, also unlike the previous documents, was mainly focused on the four situation-specific issues.
Sudapress statement while away from New York. Briefly, there was also some discussion of having a presidential statement rather than a press statement. But this would have to be adopted in a formal session of the Council and there is a complex Council procedure for agreeing to meet away from headquarters. (While article 28, paragraph 3 of the UN Charter states that "the Security Council may hold meetings at such places other than the seat of the Organization as in its judgment will best facilitate its work", in practice there have only been a dozen or so such meetings since 1946, with the last one held in Nairobi in 2004 and these meetings require consideration by Council's Standing Committee on Meetings Away from Headquarters.) Some Council members indicated that they would need to consult their capitals on such a proposal. As this could have meant a 24 hour delay, it was decided that a press statement which could be quickly turned around was the better option.
The statement condemned the "escalatory military operations" being undertaken by SAF in and around Abyei town, including the shelling of the UNMIS compound in Abyei. In addition, the statement deplored the unilateral dissolution of the Abyei administration and called for its re-establishment and for the Sudan government to halt its military operations and withdraw immediately from Abyei. It also condemned the southern forces' attack on the UNMIS convoy on 19 May and referred to the attack as a breach of agreements and a criminal act.
Several elements of the Sudan programme of the trip had to be revised due to the cancelation of the Abyei part of the trip. Originally, the Council was supposed to meet, separately, with representatives of the two main ethnic groups in the disputed area, the Misseriya and the Dinka. With Abyei being overtaken and emptied of civilian population, alternative locations needed to be found for the meetings with the representatives of the two groups, one in a north-controlled location and one in the south, due to the tribes' respective alliances. This meeting with the Misseriya took place in Khartoum whereas representatives of the Dinka travelled to Wau in the western part of the south, a location added to Council itinerary mainly for the purpose of that meeting.
In Khartoum, other meetings included:
- a visit by some members to the Mayo camp near Khartoum for displaced Southerners whose inhabitants, mostly Dinka, shared their concerns related to the 9 July secession of the south and the dilemmas they face when deciding whether to stay up north or return to the south;
- a meeting with the deputy foreign minister (who stood in for the foreign minister) during which members of the Council were accompanied by Special Representative Menkerios and UNMIS senior leadership;
- a briefing by Special Representative Ibrahim Gambari and his senior staff on UNAMID; and
- a meeting with former South African President Thabo Mbeki (who is engaged in a number of Sudan-related mediation efforts).
In Juba, the future capital of South Sudan, Council members spent several hours with President Salva Kiir and his top ministers during a meeting followed by a working dinner hosted by the government.
On its last day in Sudan, prior to the afternoon departure for Nairobi, some members of the Council flew to the village of Malau in Jonglei state where they watched a re-enactment of a cattle rescue operation by the Livestock Protection Unit of the South Sudan Police Service. (Cattle theft has been a centuries-old widespread phenomenon in the area, in recent years however, it has become a serious threat to stability and security in the state due to the prevalent presence of small arms in the post-conflict period and a considerable number of fatalities that result from cattle raids. UNMIS is helping to train the Livestock Protection Units in addressing this problem.) Later that day, they also toured the Jebel Kujur way station in Juba which is operated by UN High Commissioner for Refugees to facilitate returns south of displaced persons from the northern part of the country. They also met with representatives of the civil society and received a briefing by UNMIS staff on the planning for the follow on mission.
Soma1970 and 1973 were implemented in practice, with some alleging that NATO was "colonising" Africa and that the law of the jungle had replaced the international law. In response, apparently, some Council members who abstained on the adoption of resolution 1973, restated their reasons for doing so and some also highlighted their own concerns over the way events have unfolded in Libya since. But at least one of the abstaining members apparently also defended the prerogative of the Council with respect to any decisions on Libya.
In Sudan the delegation appeared united in their sense of deep concern over the Abyei developments. Members collectively were upset over the cancelled meetings with top Sudanese government officials. This resulted in a speedy decision to respond with a strong condemnatory statement, though there were apparently differences regarding the format of the statement, in particular regarding the possibility of holding a formal Council meeting in order to adopt a presidential statement. Russia, in particular, apparently felt that this procedural step would create a precedent and because of that the delegation would need to consult the capital. In order to come out with a statement in a timely fashion, members opted for a press statement instead. Publicly, the message from the Council members was strong and united. During a press briefing at the end of the stay in Khartoum, co-leaders of the delegation, Russia's Ambassador Vitaly Churkin and US Ambassador Susan Rice, were blunt in expressing their condemnation of the violence in Abyei and voiced members' shared deep sense of frustration over the inability to meet with top Sudanese government officials. Referring to the fact that the official reason for the last minute cancelation of the Council's meeting with the Sudanese foreign minister was his illness, Amb. Churkin stated that the Council wished him a speedy and complete recovery.
In Nairobi, the Council members apparently stood firmly united behind the clear messages to the Somali transitional leadership, calling on its representatives to stop their infighting and to refrain from taking unilateral decisions regarding their respective mandates. Members demanded that the Somali leaders focus instead on their tasks as outlined in the transitional agreements and that they immediately engage with Special Representative Mahiga. Members of the Council also told the Somali leaders that unless they improve their performance they may lose the international support the Somali institutions are financed through. Speaking during a private meeting with the Somali leadership, several members of the Council apparently reinforced each other in conveying their demands.
UN DocumenS/RES/1978 (27 April 2011) renewed UNMIS until 9 July 2011.
Security Council Presidential Statements Letter Communiqués from the consultative meetings between the AU PSC and the Security Council Security Council Press Statement Members of the Security Council Delegation
Mr Michel Régis Onanga Ndiaye, Minister Counsellor (21-25 May)
Security Council Presidential Statements
Communiqués from the consultative meetings between the AU PSC and the Security Council
Security Council Press Statement
Members of the Security Council Delegation